Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1993 01:29:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kevin Gamiel <kgamiel@vinca.cnidr.org>
Subject: Re: URN: wrapper and URLs
To: Michael Mealling <ccoprmm@oit.gatech.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199310181425.AA22784@oit.oit.gatech.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9310190144.A11432-b100000@vinca.cnidr.org>
On Mon, 18 Oct 1993, Michael Mealling wrote:
> If my summary wasn't evidence enough: I vote against Simons motion BUT
> offer a counter motion:
>
> In the interest of life and general happiness I propose that we:
>
> a) require all future URIs to start off with the URI identifier plus
> a colon in order to identify the purpose of the following URI.
Agreed.
> b) Make the statement that IF a URI does not start off with any of the
> identified URI wrappers that it MUST be a URL.
Ugly, but (argggg) understandable in context. Policy request! Policy
Request! Is a vote by physical attendants to URI meeting in Houston all
that is needed to nail down this issue one way or the other?
> c) that ALL URIs be enclosed in angle brackets when in unstructured text.
> This will also include the already existing UR*: wrapper on all non
> URL identifiers.
Yup.
>
> BUT,
> I personally still maintain and will argue the fact that adding
> URL: to the URL spec will gain us a heck of a lot more than we will
> loose by adding 5 or 6 lines of code.
Yup.
>
>
> (Simon,
> I don't know if that followed Roberts Rules or not. Sorry! ;-)
Simon? Rules? Gimme a break! :-)
Kevin
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin Gamiel - KEVIN.GAMIEL@CNIDR.ORG
MCNC CNIDR - 919-248-1911
Clearinghouse for Networked Information Discovery and Retrieval
Proud charter member of
Tar Heel Information Services - "Nothing but net!"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------