From: mitra@path.net (Mitra)
Subject: Re: options, not nesting?
Message-Id: <CFMCq4.9r@pandora.sf.ca.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1993 18:01:14 GMT
Yes! to optional information, but Yes also to nesting. I dont think that
anyone has proposed defining the set of information that must be carried in
a URM, but we do need the ability to specify whether meta information applies
to a URN or just to one of the URL's.
Any of the three formats proposed here (mine, Mike's or Ole's) will do that.
Peter - could this be done in the Whois++ format as well?
- Mitra