Message-Id: <9404071720.AA21127@ulua.hal.com>
To: Peter Deutsch <peterd@bunyip.com>
Subject: Re: Seattle minutes
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Apr 1994 10:11:00 CDT."
<9404071511.AA13038@expresso.bunyip.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1994 12:20:13 -0500
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
In message <9404071511.AA13038@expresso.bunyip.com>, Peter Deutsch writes:
>
>
>> I agree that a single protocol should suffice, though I would
>> prefer something with less packet overhead than whois++.
>> (i.e. UDP rather than TCP)
>
>It would probably be nice to have only a single protocol,
>although I don't see it as an absolute necessity at this
>point. Certainly a UDP-based solution would be a win,
Check out prospero:
ftp://prospero.isi.edu/pub/prospero/
in particular:
ftp://prospero.isi.edu/pub/prospero/../papers/prospero/prospero-bii.ps.Z
Dan