From: mitra@pandora.sf.ca.us (Mitra)
Subject: Re: Re Revised URN
Date: Mon, 16 May 1994 22:14:19 GMT
Message-Id: <Cpx1rw.JCw@pandora.sf.ca.us>
Terry,
Do you mean that hte requirement should be dropped, or that it should be
kept with a caveat that it might not be correct.
In particular, I would like it asserted that the correct situation is
that a resource has one, and only one, URN, but that applications should
acknowledge that in the real word, incorrect situations can occur.
- Mitra