From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 12:41:40 -0400
Message-Id: <9506071641.AA00372@sulphur.osf.org>
To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
Subject: Comment on draft...
> > I think that the stance of the draft, is to specify what an ideal
> > implementation should be. That doesn't mean that all implementations, in all
> > modes of operation, should follow exactly what thee draft says.
The IETF has standardized meanings for "must", "should", and "may".
The draft should use those terms precisely.
/r$